The University, its employees, and its students often benefit from participation in research activities. The University does not wish to interfere with employees' or students' legitimate research interests and academic freedom. Employees and students, in turn, must ensure that their research activities are conducted in a responsible and ethical manner.
This policy sets forth procedures and guidelines that are to be followed in the reporting and investigation of alleged research misconduct. It is applicable to all employees, officers, agents, and students of Marywood University. It meets the institution's responsibilities under the Public Health Service (PHS) Policies on Research Misconduct, 42 CFR Part 93. However, it applies to all funded research projects regardless of funding source.
Deciding Official (DO) - the institutional official who makes final determinations on allegations of research misconduct and any institutional administrative actions to be taken in response. The Deciding Official will not be the same individual as the Research Integrity Officer, and should have no direct prior involvement in the institution's inquiry, investigation, or allegation assessment procedures. A DO's appointment of an individual to assess allegations of research misconduct, or to serve on an inquiry or investigation committee, is not considered to be direct prior involvement. The Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs is the DO for Marywood University.
Research Integrity Officer (RIO) - the institutional official responsible for
The Assistant Vice President for Research is the RIO for Marywood University.
Research misconduct is fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism that is committed while proposing, performing or reviewing research or while reporting results. Research misconduct does not include honest error or differences of opinion.
1. Upon receipt of an allegation of research misconduct, the Research Integrity Officer will
2. The Research Integrity Officer will report the results of investigations conducted or overseen to the Deciding Official for a determination of appropriate actions which may include
3. Marywood University employees who are subjects of allegations will receive appropriate protections including
Marywood University employees may not retaliate in any way against complainants or witnesses. Individuals should immediately report any alleged or apparent retaliation to the Research Integrity Officer, who will review the matter and take appropriate action.
See also Office of Research and Sponsored Programs website http://www.marywood.edu/research-office/
Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Participants
02/19/10 - Approved by the President of the University as recommended by the Policy Committee of the University
Mary T. Gardier Paterson, Esquire | Secretary of the University | email@example.com